How understandable the paper is
How convincing the paper is
How well-developed and supported the various topic sentences are
This paper was very interesting to me because it introduced the analogy of the story told about the stupid horse and the story of Junior moving to Reardan to achieve hope. I liked how the author compared Junior to the horse and the reservation as the lake. The lake did pull down the horse which led to its inevitable death. Just like in the story, those who did stay on the rez did have a shorter life expectancy but they also had no hope left for them. Overall, this paper was pretty understandable and has some pretty good ideas that can be refined a bit more to make it more proficient. I was convinced that the author knew what they were talking about.
A few cons of the paper would be simple grammatical errors that could be easily fixed such as present and past tense. Also some of the sentences were very very short so maybe add a little to them. Also the format is a bit confusing as there are quotes everywhere with little analysis. I couldnt find some of the topic sentences because the quotes were used to start new paragraphs. There could be uses of transitions and concluding sentences. This could possibly be a rough draft so its understandable that the author was just placing everything where they seemed to fit but hopefully the final draft had a good "flow". Finally, I'd say that the thesis should be revised more so it could encompass all the ideas that are being mentioned within the essay.